Disambiguating the Equals Sign


Depending on context, \(x = y\) can mean any of:

  • \(x\) is known to be equal to \(y\)
  • \(x\) is assigned to be equal to y
  • \(x\) is defined to be equal to \(y\).
  • We’re trying to show \(x\) is equal to \(y\)
  • The Boolean relation of \(x = y\)

I get around this by using distinct forms of the equals sign for each of the nuances above.

I only use the equals sign when I know \(x\) is equal to \(y\).

If I’m using \(x = y\) to mean “let \(x\) be equal to \(y\)”, I use either \(x \gets y\) or \(x := y\).

If I’m defining \(x\) to be equal to \(y\), I use \(x \equiv y\) or more often \(x \stackrel{def}{=} y\) because my triple equals sign looks terrible when handwritten. The spacing is always off.

When I’m trying to show 2 sides are equal, I use \(\stackrel{?}{=}\). This has the advantage of making it clear that it’s wrong to transform both sides because I don’t know that they’re equal.The question mark conveys the idea of “dunno if they’re equal”.

For the last one, I use == like in programming. I’m used to it.

These distinctions may be overkill, but I think they make intent clearer, which is all the more valuable when you’re in a thicket of symbols without a map.

Related Posts

Use of emphasis in speech

Generating a lot of language data with a theorem prover

"Litany Against Fear" in Present Tense

When it's time to party we will party hard

these are people who died

divine carrot

the frog

what it’s like to get nail phenolization

Why 0 to the power of 0 is 1

Lines and Points are Circles