Stupidity Without The Value Judgment


I read about Carlo M. Cipolla and his Laws Of Stupidity a few weeks ago, and his definitions really stuck with me.

Stupid can be given a definition that doesn’t have an explicit value judgment attached.

A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.

He goes on:

Essentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behavior.

An intelligent person may understand the logic of a bandit. The bandit’s actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, if you like, but still rationality. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are rational you can predict it. You can foresee a bandit’s actions, his nasty manoeuvres and ugly aspirations and often can build up your defenses.

OK, maybe the implicit value judgment is still there.

Related Posts

Swastika Night

Is there a name for this construction?

Fun with negation and idioms

How to change tabs to spaces

Another Way to Write Conditional Probability

Notes for May 9, 2019

A tool to look at random images


e-ink reminisces

Edwin Edwards