Stupidity Without The Value Judgment


Stupidity

I read about Carlo M. Cipolla and his Laws Of Stupidity a few weeks ago, and his definitions really stuck with me.

Stupid can be given a definition that doesn’t have an explicit value judgment attached.

A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.

He goes on:

Essentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behavior.

An intelligent person may understand the logic of a bandit. The bandit’s actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, if you like, but still rationality. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are rational you can predict it. You can foresee a bandit’s actions, his nasty manoeuvres and ugly aspirations and often can build up your defenses.

OK, maybe the implicit value judgment is still there.

Related Posts

How I feel about ebooks

List of places where the US has been involved in regime change, with multiplicity

Accuracy vs Precision

Handy command line benchmarking tool

Stan Rogers

Ultimate Hot Couch Guy

Quote on Java Generics

The Programmer Tendency

Figure out undocumented JSON with gron

Mental Model of Dental Hygiene